Current:Home > MarketsNorth Dakota’s abortion ban will remain on hold during court appeal -MoneyBase
North Dakota’s abortion ban will remain on hold during court appeal
View
Date:2025-04-12 03:59:50
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota won’t be allowed to enforce its near total abortion ban while the state appeals a judge’s ruling that struck down the law.
The latest decision by District Judge Bruce Romanick means that, for now, his September ruling stands while the state appeals it to the North Dakota Supreme Court.
No abortion clinics have operated in North Dakota since the Red River Women’s Clinic moved from Fargo to nearby Moorhead, Minnesota, in 2022. The move came after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, triggering a North Dakota law that would have automatically banned most abortions. The statute was about to take effect when the clinic sued to stop it.
North Dakota’s abortion ban made performing the procedure a felony. The only exceptions were to prevent the mother’s death or a “serious health risk” to her. In cases of rape or incest, a patient could secure an abortion up to six weeks of gestation, which is before some people realize they are pregnant.
“The Court has found the law unconstitutional under the state constitution,” Romanick said. “It would be non-sensical for this Court to keep a law it has found to be unconstitutional in effect pending appeal.”
The newest decision is important because it means people with serious pregnancy complications who go to hospitals seeking medical care don’t have to worry about their treatment being delayed under the law, said Meetra Mehdizadeh, staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, who also is an attorney for the plaintiffs.
“It just makes pregnancy safer for everyone to know that if that does happen, they will have the option of being able to seek that care in-state and won’t have to worry that their doctors are going to feel forced to delay care or that their doctors are not going to be able to provide standard-of-care treatment because of the law,” she said.
Last month, the judge found North Dakota’s abortion ban unconstitutionally vague, and ruled that pregnant women in the state have a fundamental right to abortion before a fetus is viable outside the womb.
The state plans to appeal that September ruling.
A text message was sent to North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley Thursday seeking comment about whether the state would also appeal Romanick’s most recent decision.
The judge heard arguments Thursday morning from attorneys representing the state and the abortion rights plaintiffs, including the women’s clinic and several physicians.
In court, Special Assistant Attorney General Dan Gaustad said the September ruling raises questions and creates confusion about what it means for dozens of state’s attorneys not named in the lawsuit and for other district court judges.
“Let’s let the North Dakota Supreme Court decide this issue and let the law remain in place like it has been,” Gaustad said.
Melissa Rutman, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the state hadn’t met the requirements to stay the ruling that struck down the abortion ban.
“The court already concluded that there is confusion if the law is in effect because as a matter of law, the law is too vague on its face to afford doctors due process rights, and physicians are forced to guess whether their medical decisions will subject them to criminal liability,” she said.
The judge also said his previous order and judgment “are not confusing.”
veryGood! (7363)
Related
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Jessica Simpson Sets the Record Straight on Whether She Uses Ozempic
- New Faces on a Vital National Commission Could Help Speed a Clean Energy Transition
- California Passes Law Requiring Buffer Zones for New Oil and Gas Wells
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- The U.S. added 339,000 jobs in May. It's a stunningly strong number
- Colleen Ballinger's Team Sets the Record Straight on Blackface Allegations
- Just Two Development Companies Drive One of California’s Most Controversial Climate Programs: Manure Digesters
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Nearly 200 Countries Approve a Biodiversity Accord Enshrining Human Rights and the ‘Rights of Nature’
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- For Many, the Global Warming Confab That Rose in the Egyptian Desert Was a Mirage
- Ashley Benson Is Engaged to Oil Heir Brandon Davis: See Her Ring
- ‘It Is Going to Take Real Cuts to Everyone’: Leaders Meet to Decide the Future of the Colorado River
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Text scams, crypto crackdown, and an economist to remember
- The inventor's dilemma
- The Plastics Industry Searches for a ‘Circular’ Way to Cut Plastic Waste and Make More Plastics
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Save 57% On Sunday Riley Beauty Products and Get Glowing Skin
Inside Clean Energy: US Electric Vehicle Sales Soared in First Quarter, while Overall Auto Sales Slid
Hollywood writers still going strong, a month after strike began
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Western Forests, Snowpack and Wildfires Appear Trapped in a Vicious Climate Cycle
Da Brat Gives Birth to First Baby With Wife Jesseca Judy Harris-Dupart
Calculating Your Vacation’s Carbon Footprint, One Travel Mode at a Time