Current:Home > StocksSpaceX faces $633,000 fine from FAA over alleged launch violations: Musk plans to sue -MoneyBase
SpaceX faces $633,000 fine from FAA over alleged launch violations: Musk plans to sue
View
Date:2025-04-14 11:03:20
- The news is the latest clash between SpaceX and the FAA, which briefly grounded the company's Falcon 9 rocket late in August.
- Musk and other SpaceX officials have not been shy about keeping their frustrations with federal regulators a secret, blasting them in a blog post last week.
SpaceX has once again run afoul of federal regulators, who now want to fine Elon Musk's spaceflight company more than half-a-million dollars for what they allege are two separate launch violations last year.
The Federal Aviation Administration announced Tuesday its proposal to hit SpaceX with a total of $633,009 in civil penalties for what the agency claims were failures by the company to follow license requirements ahead of the launches. The news is the latest clash between SpaceX and the FAA, which briefly grounded the company's Falcon 9 rocket late in August.
“Safety drives everything we do at the FAA, including a legal responsibility for the safety oversight of companies with commercial space transportation licenses,” FAA Chief Counsel Marc Nichols said in a statement. “Failure of a company to comply with the safety requirements will result in consequences.”
In response, Musk, founder and CEO of SpaceX, took to his social media site X to indicate his plans to sue the agency for "regulatory overreach."
Polaris Dawn:Commercial spaceflight was a mission for the history books: Look back at the biggest moments
FAA proposes penalties over 2 launches in 2023
The FAA, which licenses commercial rocket launches, said the proposed penalties are in relation to alleged infractions that occurred during launches in June and July 2023.
The first launch the agency cited is the PSN Satria Mission, which lifted off June 18, 2023 from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida with an Indonesian communications satellite, according to Space.com.
That May, SpaceX had "submitted a request to revise its communications plan related to" its license to launch from the Florida site, the FAA said in a news release. The request include two proposed revisions: adding a new launch control room at one of the facility's hangars, and removing from its procedures a readiness poll previously taken two hours before liftoff.
But before the FAA could approve the request, SpaceX went ahead with the PSN Satria launch with those revisions anyway, according to the agency, which is proposing a $175,000 fine for each of the two alleged violations.
The second launch happened on July 28, 2023 during Jupiter 3, according to the FAA. Also known as EchoStar XXIV, the launch involved a giant telecom satellite rocketing to orbit on a Falcon Heavy rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center.
The FAA is accusing SpaceX of using a new rocket propellant farm at the Kennedy Space Center that the agency had not yet approved. For that alleged violation, the FAA is proposing an additional $283,009 penalty.
SpaceX has 30 days to respond to the FAA after receiving the agency’s enforcement letters.
SpaceX Falcon 9 grounded earlier in September
News of the proposed fines come just three weeks after the FAA opted to ground SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket following a fiery landing mishap.
Though the Aug. 28 mission was an otherwise successful orbital satellite delivery, a rocket booster tipped over and exploded upon returning to Earth. In response, the FAA briefly ordered that no Falcon 9 launches could take place until it had time to investigate the cause of the reason for the landing failure.
The Falcon 9 was once again cleared for takeoff within a couple days even as the FAA investigation continued.
The September grounding was the second in recent months: the FAA halted Falcon 9 launches for two weeks in July following an oxygen leak issue.
The FAA's proposed penalties against SpaceX also follow a groundbreaking commercial spaceflight mission that the company oversaw. The Polaris Dawn astronauts who flew to orbit on a SpaceX Dragon landed Sunday after a five-day mission that included a pioneering spacewalk.
SpaceX hits back against FAA, regulations
Musk and other SpaceX officials have not been shy about keeping their frustrations with federal regulators a secret.
In a lengthy blog post last week, the company railed against regulatory requirements from agencies like both the FAA and Environmental Protection Agency.
"Unfortunately, we continue to be stuck in a reality where it takes longer to do the government paperwork to license a rocket launch than it does to design and build the actual hardware," SpaceX wrote in the post. "This should never happen and directly threatens America's position as the leader in space."
That post largely focused on SpaceX's Starship megarocket, which the company is developing to transport astronauts to the lunar surface – and perhaps even one day, Mars. SpaceX blasted the FAA for licensing the Starship for a November launch, despite the vehicle being ready since early August for its fifth test flight.
The gargantuan rocket, which has so far only undergone uncrewed tests, managed to once again make it to orbit in its fourth and most recent test in June before accomplishing a first: splashing down for its first successful landing in the Indian Ocean.
"This delay was not based on a new safety concern," SpaceX claimed, "but instead driven by superfluous environmental analysis."
Eric Lagatta covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at [email protected]
veryGood! (1156)
Related
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Hollywood actors go on strike, say it's time for studio execs to 'wake up'
- Dolly Parton Makes Surprise Appearance on Claim to Fame After Her Niece Is Eliminated
- Why inflation is losing its punch — and why things could get even better
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Get Shiny, Frizz-Free, Waterproof Hair With These 30% Off Color Wow Deals From Amazon Prime Day 2023
- For the Third Time, Black Residents in Corpus Christi’s Hillcrest Neighborhood File a Civil Rights Complaint to Fend Off Polluting Infrastructure
- Every Bombshell From Secrets of Miss America
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Our fireworks show
Ranking
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Colson Whitehead channels the paranoia and fear of 1970s NYC in 'Crook Manifesto'
- Petition Circulators Are Telling California Voters that a Ballot Measure Would Ban New Oil and Gas Wells Near Homes. In Fact, It Would Do the Opposite
- Chicago Institutions Just Got $25 Million to Study Local Effects of Climate Change. Here’s How They Plan to Use It
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Good jobs Friday
- What to know about Prime, the Logan Paul drink that Sen. Schumer wants investigated
- What’s Good for Birds Is Good for People and the Planet. But More Than Half of Bird Species in the U.S. Are in Decline
Recommendation
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
More renters facing eviction have a right to a lawyer. Finding one can be hard
The creator of luxury brand Brother Vellies is fighting for justice in fashion
Amazon Prime Day 2023 Tech Deals: Save on Apple Watches, Samsung's Frame TV, Bose Headphones & More
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Inside Clean Energy: ‘Solar Coaster’ Survivors Rejoice at Senate Bill
Why Filming This Barbie Scene Was the Worst Day of Issa Rae’s Life
They're illegal. So why is it so easy to buy the disposable vapes favored by teens?