Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -MoneyBase
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-15 02:21:50
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (2368)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Honda, Toyota, Volkswagen among 2.3 million vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
- Texas man made $1.76 million from insider trading by eavesdropping on wife's business calls, Justice Department says
- Volkswagen pickup truck ideas officially shelved for North America
- Trump's 'stop
- Caribbean authorities say missing American couple is feared dead after 3 prisoners hijacked yacht
- Mean Girls Joke That “Disappointed” Lindsay Lohan Removed From Digital Release
- Alec Baldwin to stand trial this summer on a charge stemming from deadly ‘Rust’ movie set shooting
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Attorneys argue over whether Mississippi legislative maps dilute Black voting power
Ranking
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- 15-year-old from Massachusetts arrested in shooting of Vermont woman found in a vehicle
- Michigan man gets minimum 30 years in prison in starvation death of his disabled brother
- Man is shot and killed on a light rail train in Seattle, and suspect remains on the loose
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Bradley Cooper Proves He Is Gigi Hadid’s Biggest Supporter During NYC Shopping Trip
- Handcuffed car theft suspect being sought after fleeing from officers, police say
- MLB rumors: Will Snell, Chapman sign soon with Bellinger now off the market?
Recommendation
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Zac Efron Reacts To Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce High School Musical Comparisons
Michigan man gets minimum 30 years in prison in starvation death of his disabled brother
Full transcript of Face the Nation, Feb. 25, 2024
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Mother of missing Wisconsin boy, man her son was staying with charged with child neglect
FTC and 9 states sue to block Kroger-Albertsons supermarket merger
When is forgetting normal — and when is it worrisome? A neuroscientist weighs in